Latest news and stories about election campaign in daily life in Portugal for expats and residents.
Moedas has secured an absolute majority with former Chega members, raising questions about the implications for Lisbon's political landscape and whether this shift marks the end of certain political red lines.
In a recent address, Portuguese President Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa emphasized the importance of voting in the upcoming presidential runoff, framing it as a means to overcome the recent calamities caused by severe storms. He commended the resilience of those affected and highlighted the critical nature of voter turnout in this challenging context.
A day-four tracking poll after the televised debate shows António José Seguro still ahead in a hypothetical second round with 57.8% but down four percentage points from earlier reads, while André Ventura is also in decline. The main movement is toward blank and null votes — and a persistent 7.5% undecided — suggesting the debate pushed some voters away from both candidates rather than directly to Ventura. Analysts note Seguro appears the more independent figure and that a Ventura victory would have clear consequences for Chega, but any direct boost to the PS from a victory by its preferred candidate is far from assured. Public expectations of a political split after 8 February are already growing.
With ten days until the presidential second round, a government-declared state of calamity has become central to the campaign, constraining campaigning and reframing public debate around emergency management, services and state capacity. The development exposes political faultlines — including the right's recurring mistake of underestimating left-wing incumbents — and underscores how a recent state blackout left communities to fend for themselves, highlighting the fragility of public institutions. The emergency framing is likely to influence voter perceptions of safety, governance and policy ahead of the run-off.
A daily poll finds most Portuguese want defeated presidential candidates to declare endorsements and that any such support should favour António José Seguro. The piece argues Montenegro was right not to declare backing, but if he did it should be for Seguro, while emphasising that centre-right support for Seguro is not a blank cheque and would bring concrete political responsibility. It also notes former PSD leader Rui Rio has publicly said he will vote for Seguro ahead of the 8 February second round against André Ventura.
As the official campaign week begins ahead of the run-off, Seguro is emphasising concrete policy areas—notably healthcare and defence—to court issue-focused and undecided voters with substantive proposals. By contrast, Ventura is maintaining daily grassroots contact through street and market visits, relying on visibility and personal outreach to energise supporters. The contrast between a policy-driven strategy and retail politics will shape narratives and could be decisive in persuading the run-off electorate.
PÚBLICO and RTP publish a poll ahead of the 8 February presidential run-off between António José Seguro and André Ventura. The coverage situates the run-off within broader party shifts evident in recent legislative elections, arguing this realignment may be irreversible and that both the PS and PSD must rethink strategies to stay politically relevant. Commentators note a widespread lack of conviction in either candidate’s stated values — framing abstention as a responsible choice for some voters — and CNN Portugal’s João Marcelino interprets Marques Mendes’s endorsement of Seguro as signalling the PSD leadership’s and prime minister’s tactical aims for the run-off.
The surprise runoff between António José Seguro and André Ventura, set for 8 February, signals counter-power reaching Belém and exposes the deep fragmentation revealed in the first round. The pairing — a centre-left establishment figure facing a populist Chega leader — increases uncertainty over governability, forces realignments across the political spectrum and will pressure the Government to defend institutions while recalibrating policy priorities. The second round outcome will depend on turnout and how votes from eliminated candidates transfer, with potential consequences for debate on immigration, social policy and the balance of forces in parliament.
In this analytical interview André Ventura frames his presidential bid less as a straightforward fight to win and more as a strategic move that reshapes Portugal's right. While distancing himself from Donald Trump’s “erratic” personal style, Ventura positions his campaign to influence policy debates and the balance between CHEGA and the moderate right — a dynamic that may cost his party seats even as it forces mainstream conservatives to respond. The piece examines the purpose of his candidacy, likely impacts on the election, and the policy and rhetorical choices shaping his appeal.
Two candidates progressed to the second round, but the electoral picture is nuanced: several campaigns achieved relative victories or damaging setbacks when measured against expectations rather than raw placement. The analysis distinguishes clear winners — those who gained momentum, consolidated coalitions or exceeded polling — from losers who underperformed, fractured support bases or failed to translate resources into votes. It also outlines the likely consequences for party leaders and backers, the shifting calculus for endorsements and alliances before the runoff, and the policy and strategic questions now facing the remaining contenders.
With 11 candidates on the ballot, Portugal’s presidential contest has narrowed to a rare second round on 8 February between António José Seguro and André Ventura. The shape of the runoff will be driven by two things: the distribution of votes from the first round and the endorsements — formal and informal — that shift centre, left and right voters. Parties and figures on the left will weigh tactical appeals to prevent a far‑right victory, while some centre‑right actors face taboos about endorsing Ventura and may prefer abstention or ambiguous signals. The analysis examines likely endorsement patterns, voter transferability, campaign messaging, and scenarios that could determine whether the contest consolidates around a moderate alternative or legitimises a hard‑right presidency with broader consequences for Portuguese politics.
Update: A new piece underscores the same binary focus but adds procedural context: the second ballot shortens electoral timelines up to 8 February, compressing campaigning and decision windows for endorsements and tactical voting. Crucially, the electoral rules preserve early voting despite the accelerated schedule, meaning mobilising early voters and communicating endorsement signals quickly will be decisive. The article reiterates that tracking first‑round vote transfers and the public and private signals from centre and centre‑right figures — including abstention or soft endorsements — will shape whether the runoff consolidates around Seguro or hands legitimacy to Ventura.
A concise, practical guide to voting in this Sunday’s presidential election. It explains how to complete ballot papers correctly, what constitutes a spoilt vote, polling hours, ID and postal-vote rules, and how votes are counted and announced. The piece also outlines options for non-participation and places the 2026 presidential contest in its wider democratic and policy context.
The presidential campaign skirted constitutional debate, focusing on policy and partisan positioning more suited to a head-of-government race than a head-of-state contest. António José Seguro — the Socialist-backed candidate — presents himself as the moderate alternative and argues the Constitution need not be revised, only respected; meanwhile Luís Montenegro will run as his party’s candidate. The piece argues the Republic needs a president who acts as a moderator, respects institutional limits and upholds the separation of powers.
A DN/Aximage poll finds Socialist candidate Seguro leading Ventura by 20 percentage points in a hypothetical second-round (run-off) contest. Commentary in the piece highlights tactical voting for Seguro to block the right, the extreme or the current government, warns that a Ventura vs Cotrim run-off would be damaging for the right, and reports Ventura dismissing calls for Montenegro’s backing while claiming stronger polling levels.
On the penultimate day of a Porto‑focused campaign, Mendes — the candidate backed by the PSD and CDS — intensified calls for voters to concentrate their ballots next Sunday, warning that the result must not be left to chance. He framed the vote as decisive for who will occupy Belém and criticised the broader presidential campaign as lacking substantive policy ideas, arguing it is time to end an empty contest and consolidate support behind a clear alternative. The intervention underlines a tactical push for vote consolidation and a critique of opponents’ absence of coherent presidential proposals.
In under 24 hours Cotrim de Figueiredo’s campaign was rocked by two controversies — a dispute linked to Ventura’s place in the second round and an allegation of harassment — prompting intense media and commentator reaction. A Catholic University poll that places Cotrim third, despite his insistence he can contest the second round, provided immediate relief and helped dissipate some of the political damage. Commentators including Miguel Santos Carrapatoso, Carlos Rodrigues and Bruno Batista framed the episode as a pivotal, potentially career-defining moment: Rodrigues argued Cotrim never sought the presidency, while Batista called the previous day a disastrous political mistake. The net effect is a campaign bruised but not decisively derailed, with the poll softening public fallout even as scrutiny and debate continue.
Seguro says he is aiming to finish first in the first round to prevent the so-called 'extremist' candidate, notably André Ventura, from reaching the run-off. He has raised his target from simply qualifying for the second round to topping it, reframing the race as a showdown between 'democrats' and 'extremism' and attempting to reshape voter choice. The move comes as a PS‑backed candidate also appears well placed to contest the presidency, increasing the strategic importance of securing first place in round one.
Day nine of the Tracking Poll, reported by Pedro Benevides, shows a growing three-way dynamic in the Portuguese presidential race: António José Seguro, André Ventura and João Cotrim de Figueiredo are pulling ahead of Henrique Gouveia e Melo and Luís Marques Mendes. The pattern suggests the contest may crystallise into a three-way fight in the final campaign days, and — with the exception of Chega's leader — most main contenders have yet to secure full backing from their own bases.
João Cotrim de Figueiredo’s campaign, which had been gaining momentum, suffered a serious setback after a strategic misstep on second-round strategy and the resurfacing of a harassment allegation on social media. By not ruling out support for Ventura, Cotrim exposed himself to attacks and fractured the narrative of steady progress; the harassment allegation — reportedly known within Iniciativa Liberal for two years — compounded the damage and prompted him to decry ‘low‑level’ and ‘dirty’ politics. The episode shifted the campaign’s focus onto Cotrim personally, energised opponents and risked undoing recent gains as rivals consolidated backing ahead of a possible second round.
David Pontes argues that the so-called elections for the presidencies of the CCDRs are a façade: party leaders pick office-holders behind closed doors, depriving voters and local stakeholders of genuine choice. The editorial contends this practice undermines democratic legitimacy, concentrates power within party machines and weakens accountability in regional policy, and calls for transparent, competitive selection procedures and broader electoral reform.
On the ninth day of the official presidential campaign most candidates focused their activities in Portugal’s interior, campaigning across almost the entire mainland. The concentration in rural and regional areas indicates a deliberate strategy to court voters outside major urban centres, raise visibility in less-served communities and address local issues that could prove decisive in a fragmented race. Political observers interpret the interior push as an effort to broaden appeal beyond traditional strongholds and capture swing support.
With the campaign entering its final week, António José Seguro has shifted from leftward appeals to target centrist and moderate voters, presenting himself as a 'calm force' who would be a 'courageous' but not 'irresponsible' president. The move is framed as a strategic pivot to neutralise perceptions that he is insecure and to broaden his appeal while he remains well placed in the polls. The approach balances promises of principled leadership with a deliberate emphasis on stability, but risks alienating his left‑wing base even as it seeks centre ground.
At a campaign dinner in Lousã (Coimbra), presidential candidate Luís Marques Mendes presented a deliberate profile of a ‘firm but calm’ Presidency in Belém, arguing that steadiness and measured leadership are what the office requires. Positioning himself as a reassuring, experienced alternative, Mendes signalled an appeal to centrist and undecided voters and claimed he is in ‘pole position’ to reach the second round — an implicit campaign strategy to consolidate support ahead of a likely two‑stage contest. The remarks underscore a campaign focused on stability, competence and broadening appeal rather than polarising rhetoric.
António José Seguro presented his honorary committee and national campaign team and will hold a rally in Leiria as he renewed an appeal for tactical voting. He warned that without strategic consolidation the left risks being excluded from the second round, portraying the moment as a 'point of no return', while PS figures such as José Luís Carneiro positioned Seguro as a potential swing vote. The report also explains the concept of tactical voting in the first round and notes Seguro's pledge to occupy the presidency with dignity and without political theatre.
The Vizinhos de Lisboa association has asked the Mayor of Lisbon, Carlos Moedas, to notify the presidential campaigns of António José Seguro, Marques Mendes, and André Ventura, demanding the removal of election posters still on public roads. As reported by DN, this is due to campaign budget savings, as they are waiting for the propaganda to be replaced by materials from the parties that supported them. In the letter sent to Carlos Moedas, the association highlights that weeks after the election, the posters remain visible, contributing to the degradation of the city's urban image and visual pollution. The association requests that the municipality notify the campaign structures to remove the materials promptly, or face forced removal at the candidates' expense if they fail to comply within a reasonable timeframe.
Months after the presidential election, campaign posters for candidates like Marques Mendes, António José Seguro, and João Cotrim de Figueiredo are still visible across Portugal. The delay in removal is largely due to financial constraints and the practice of waiting for parties to produce new promotional materials to replace the old ones. While some candidates, such as André Ventura and Henrique Gouveia e Melo, acted quickly to clear their visual footprint, others are leaving their posters up to save on removal costs, despite the political and aesthetic implications of keeping outdated campaign imagery in public spaces.
Aware of the impact of the bad weather, both candidates adapted to the circumstances.
Álvaro Beleza (PS) believes the campaign's main focus is on helping people. Luís Paulo Fernandes (Chega) says Ventura's “outburst” is about proposing real solutions to deal with the effects.
The presidential candidate visited an affected area for the first time, accompanied by the press.
The candidate has ruled out discussing regionalisation for now.
