The appointment system for the 13 judges of the Constitutional Court (TC) requires a two-thirds majority vote in the Assembly of the Republic. Historically, this has ensured a balance between judges appointed by the two parties that founded the democratic regime. The author argues that altering this balance based on a temporary parliamentary situation would constitute a structural change and a potential constitutional rupture. Furthermore, the author highlights that a clear majority of Portuguese voters support parties that uphold the Constitution, and warns the PSD against forming alliances with anti-system parties to appoint judges, urging moderate deputies to protect the integrity of the Constitutional Court.
Political balance and the guarantee of the Constitution
Friday, 27 March 2026RSS

Context & Explainers
The Constitutional Court (Tribunal Constitucional) is Portugal's highest court for constitutional review, responsible for checking whether laws and statutes comply with the Constitution and for annulling or suspending unconstitutional measures. FNAM's push for a review matters because the court can strike down or block parts of the regional emergency services statute, directly affecting how emergency care is regulated.
AI Summary AvailableDebate grows over Constitutional Court judge appointment processRead the synthesized summary with context and explainers
View full article on Diário de Notícias





